The War.

FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY for ever!!

pátek 30. března 2012

Being a Muslim woman

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim. This is not # hearsay,
and it will scare you. Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards # the
end. Joys of Muslim Women* ****
by Nonie Darwish

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old
and have sexual intimacy with this child, consummating the marriage by 9.
The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes # his
slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her # as
a toy.
Even though a woman is abused, she cannot obtain a divorce.
To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.
Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the
family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an
honour killing) to restore the honour of the family. Husbands can beat # their
wives 'at will' and the man does not have to say why he has beaten her.
The husband is permitted to have 4 wives and a temporary wife for an hour
(prostitute) at his discretion.
The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of
the woman.
In the Western World (UK) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so
the wife cannot obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control
of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters
attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting
themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.
By passing this on, enlightened women may avoid becoming a slave under
Shariah Law.*
Ripping the West in Two**. *Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the # goal
of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping # Western
law and liberty in two.
She recently authored the book, *Cruel and Usual **Punishment**: The
Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law*.
Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before
immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father
died while leading covert attacks on Israel . He was a high-ranking
Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza . When he # died,
he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status
earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.
But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her
own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after
hearing a Christian preacher on television.
In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping Shariah law - what it is,
what it means and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.
For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose Sharia on # the
world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. # Westerners
generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each
individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be
subjugated or killed in this world.
Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring # that
Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the # world.
While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of # the
golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and
another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh
century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from # and
subjugate others.
While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a
personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates
executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as
criticism.
It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree # that
those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be # executed.
Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by
many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through
intimidation.
While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over
time, Darwish explains how petrol dollars are being used to grow an
extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and
elsewhere.
#

středa 28. března 2012

Google com. nepovolil a zakázal reklamu AntiMesita o.s.!!

Samotný google.com mi poslal nabídku, zda u jeho společnosti nechci inzerovat. Po zvážení jsem si řekl "proč ne, ale opatrně". Vše jsem vyplnil, odeslal peníze. Ale ihned mi přišlo na můj mail vyrozumění, že naše reklama "AntiMešita o.s." je zakázána. Níže uvádím sdělení a vysvětlení, kterých se mi dostalo od google.com.
Myslím, že není třeba nic dodávat.

KOPIE
Vážený inzerente AdWords,

při kontrole vašeho účtu jsme zjistili, že nejméně jedna vaše reklama
či klíčové slovo byly zamítnuty. Dokud reklamy či klíčová slova
neupravíte tak, aby vyhovovaly našim zásadám, nebudou se reklamy moci
zobrazovat na Googlu, na stránkách partnerů ve vyhledávací síti ani
v umístěních v reklamní síti.

Níže najdete důvod zamítnutí reklam či klíčových slov. Na konci e-mailu
pak najdete zprávu o problému, v níž jsou uvedeny podrobnosti o
zamítnutých reklamách či klíčových slovech a o tom, jak lze problém
odstranit.

====================
Důvod zamítnutí
====================
Negativní projevy a násilí: Nepřijatelný negativistický obsah: Zásady
společnosti Google v současnosti nepovolují inzerci webových stránek,
které obsahují memorabilia nacismu nebo sběratelské předměty vztahující
se ke Kukluxklanu.
Jak je uvedeno v našich smluvních podmínkách pro
inzerci, vyhrazujeme si právo uveřejňovat na svých stránkách reklamy
podle vlastního uvážení. Váše reklama byla v tuto chvíli pozastavena.
--------------------

Opakované porušení zásad může vést k trvalému zrušení účtu AdWords a
všech souvisejících účtů. Chcete-li, aby účet zůstal aktivní, dodržujte
naše zásady inzerce. Zásady inzerce naleznete na adrese
http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/static.py?hl=cs&page=guide_toc.cs&path=policy.

S pozdravem
tým Google AdWords

Tato zpráva byla zaslána z e-mailové adresy, která slouží pouze pro
oznámení a nepřijímá příchozí e-maily. Máte-li otázky ohledně našich
zásad, kontaktujte nás prostřednictvím centra nápovědy AdWords na
adrese http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/request.py?hl=cs.
Vyberte téma Schvalování reklam a zásady. Přístup na tuto stránku může
vyžadovat přihlášení.
----------------------------------------------
Kampaň: www.antimešita.eu, reklamní sestava: Ad Group #1'
----------------------------------------------

Text reklamy:

AntiMešita o.s.
Islamizace musí být zastavena.
Islamizace ničí demokracii, svobody
www.atimesita.eu

Stav reklamy: Zamítnuta
Problém s reklamou: Negativní projevy a násilí

KONEC CITACE
Jsme řádně registrovaným občanským sdružením a máme potvrzení z MV ČR, že nejsme extremistická organizace. Přesto nás google.com zařadilo mezi extremisty a zakázalo naši prezentaci v reklamě.
ing. Valentin Kusák
předseda AntiMešita o.s. a AntiMešita-Envi o.s.
www.atimešita.eu

úterý 6. března 2012

Slaughtering Sheep: The Planned Destruction of Canada’s Sovereignty By Immigration By: Shawn Dalton Part III.

One of the most popular myths is that low birth rates demand high immigration. Canada might not be growing like the third world, but is it indeed a dying country? In an article entitled “The year ahead” immigration lawyer Ryan Rosenburg analyzed Canada’s demographic scenario. He stated:

“By comparison, according to Statistics Canada, Canada’s current birth rate is approximately 1.1 per cent (381,000 births) and our current death rate is approximately 0.72 per cent (247,000 deaths).” This equals 134,000 people (381,000-247,000) each year. He then explained:

“With a national population of 34 million people, 240,000 to 265,000 new permanent residents in 2011 represents approximately 0.70 to 0.78 per cent of our current population. In 2006, Statistics Canada estimated Canada’s population at 30 million people and at the time 240,000 to 265,000 new immigrants represented approximately 0.80 to 0.88 per cent of our then population.”

Upon more careful analysis and examination, it is observed that this isn’t even close to the reality. A Canadian high school math wiz with a bad case of zits and crooked glasses simply subtracted 34 million in 2010 from 30 million in 2006. That totaled four million people over a 4-year period. Thus 4 million people divided by 4 years equaled one million people per year. Therefore the average population growth for Canada between 2006 and 2010 wasn’t 0.80 to 0.88 at all. It’s a lot closer to 3.18% each year or 866,000 people and remember to add in an extra 134,000 Canadians from natural growth (births minus deaths). Since 2006, Canada’s population had increased by 1 million people each year. Doesn’t Canada have a labor shortage in key sectors? Isn’t Canada’s labor force simply disappearing like an endangered tropical rain forest?

“Unemployment in Canada, as of May 2002, was almost 8 percent, a number that included many well –educated post – secondary graduates. Moreover, a large group of young workers have just begun entering the labor market. These are the baby – boom echo, the offspring of the boomers. They were born between 1980 and 1995 and, at 6.5 million, they are the second – largest population cohort in Canada, after the boomers themselves. A steady stream of echo boomers will be looking for their first jobs between now and 2015. Why make their entry into the labor force more difficult by bringing in armies of competing workers from abroad?”

Canada’s foreign-born population is less than a quarter and there are tens of thousands of highly skilled Canadian college and university students that confidently look forward to earning good money in exchange for hard earned degrees and diplomas. The majority of immigrants used to arrive in Canada from developed nations with strong educational systems and stable democracies. After 1991, the Canadian government decided to pursue ethnic votes and started mass immigration from the third world to achieve this objective. Lowell Green was able to get some very detailed information straight from the government’s database.

“In an effort to keep everything as current as possible, I have been able to obtain some figures from Immigration Canada for 2007 and 2008. While a breakdown per individual nation is not available, here are the numbers for those two years on a regional basis:

Source area Total immigration 2007-2008

Africa and the Middle East 99,878
Asia – Pacific 230,138
South and Central America 52,385
United States 21,665
Europe and the UK 79,720

It doesn’t take a genius or mathematician to decipher what’s happening.

The Four –to-One Ratio

We’ve accepted 330,015 immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, Asia and the Pacific in the past two years but only 101,385 from the UK, Europe and the US.”

Isn’t Canada simply creating millions of jobs for newcomers? Does Canada actually create millions of great paying jobs for native-born Canadian as well as newcomers each and every single year? CIBC’s Chief Economist Benjamin Tal explained in a detailed report why this simply isn’t even close to the reality. He wrote:

“the softening in the monthly pace of job creation from an average of 31,000 in 2010 to 20,000 in 2011 will single-handedly slow growth in personal spending by more than 0.4 percentage points,”.

Therefore, in 2010, 372,000 new jobs were created (31,000 X 12 months) and Canada had 1.4 million people unemployed. In 2011, Canada is expected to create about 240,000 (20,000 X 12 months) new jobs. That’s a 35% plunge in what is shaping up to be Canada’s worst recession ever. Most developed nations have slashed immigration to a trickle to allow their native labor markets time to recover. They don’t dare flood the market with 250,000 new entrants and with family reunification, up that number to 866,000 new entrants. How many of these people actually dug in their heels and stayed?

“A 2006 Statistics Canada study revealed something rather astonishing. Many thousands of immigrants do not come here to become Canadian or make Canada their home: more than one – sixth of all immigrants who come to Canada return to their native countries within a year, and one – third within twenty years!”